daily life as life goes on . . .

A most interesting read (which I read) has been suggested by my sister-in-law, increased in importance by my father’s experience, and cogently argued by a concerned academic/authour.

The article (and here my library background kicks in):  Guretzki, David.  Three Dimensional Conscience:  A Theo-Legal Proposal for Testing Conscience Clams.  The Supreme Court Law Review, Second Series:  Volume 113, 2023, pp. 38-52.  I understand that the Judges on the Supreme Court of Canada all receive a copy of this series.

In summary, David makes a case for legal conscience cases needing to provide evidences of three areas:  1)  a sincerely and visibly practiced belief, 2) A community of conviction (from which a sincerely held belief may have originated), and 3) A transcendent Norm (a universal moral reality).

A slight divergence here to explain my interest in these areas. 

My father was a “conchie” (conscientious objector) in World War II.  Guretzki touches on the whole pacifist phenomenon of breaking conscription law as a matter of conscience.  As a child, my father’s conversations with friends about moral decline still stick with me – often generated around a moral conscience that he held – and which was currently being assailed by a more lenient society.

A good friend of mine served as a surgeon – in the 1990’s our coffee times were both personal and professional.  The matter of surgeons being required to perform abortions (and the spectre of MAiD) occupied our chats as we discussed how even conscience guarantees in law might not be of much consequence.  

As a bit of a research nerd, a theology buff and a philosophy dabbler this area has become even more complicated as we have entered an age of self-spirituality, individual moral agents who claim only self-revelation to guide their conscience, and relativism’s strongly occurring head.  These and other factors have raised a spectre of moral opportunism, radical autonomism and fanaticism, and communal relativism and legal tribalism (Thanks, David, for those categories).

All that to say, Guretzki lays out a good case to help the law (lawyers and judges included in that broad term) to adjudicate conscience cases. 

Just as a teaser as you look over Guretzki’s three dimensional conscience article – is the whole area of freedom in our Canadian society somehow related to conscience?  OOPS, I just gave away the first paragraph of the article!

Upon retirement from decades of Christian ministry work I was given an “inukshuk carving” – an image in the likeness of a human.  You may have seen some of these creations.  Most notable are rock formations that are highlighted in sparse surroundings. 

The accompanying plaque referenced I Thessalonians 1:3.  Indeed (and truly this speaks of doing, not just being human) these are aspirational goals I have had over the years.  In humility, my hope is that I have been able to truly live up to these standards.

Your work produced by faith

Your labour prompted by love

You endurance inspired by hope

in our Lord Jesus Christ

I awake to a full view of our backyard each morning. 

Our rental unit is situated in a development complex.  We do not have to care for the yard.  At the same time we get to watch those who do. 

A recent hailstorm stripped leaves and fruit from some of the trees.  The vinyl fence saw so significant holes appear.  The grass just seemed to survive all on its own. 

The yard workers contracted by the condominium board were by a few days later.  With mechanical equipment they cleaned the debris quickly.  How soon the fence is fixed will depend on a number of factors – one of which I imagine will be the busyness of contractors after such a strong hailstorm.

Meanwhile I’m having fun.  A mirror on our van was cracked.  Rather than submit a claim (which may have been less than our deductible) I took to the internet.  Turns out the fix would be fun to do, be less than $100 and could be completed in this next week.  So, new project on the way!!  And hailstone pock marks?  Appears there may be an easy fix there as well. 

Life can be fun!

What literature does is not what you may think.  At least the literature of narrative tends to leave you wide open for speculation in your thinking – which thoughts may be totally opposite or at least varied from other’s thinking .  Instead of a firm direction – many directions are opened.

We watched a recommended movie called “Amsterdam” last night.  The movie was probably somewhat sanitized from what could have been shown, and went at a cumbersome pace.  But, in the end (and at the end) I felt like this was not about an actual historical time and event, as loosely implied in the opening header. 

Rather, . . . Is this just another conspiracy theory?  Or perhaps a thinly veiled protest against Donald Trump?  Or a place for A list celebrities to congregate?  Or an avenue to protest old conservative values?  Or . . .

Not a recommendation to watch the movie!  Rather an observation on how narratives in the form of theatrical presentations often generate many different political and personal perspectives.