Every once in awhile an article pushes you to think.
What is churchless faith? Almost sounds like an oxymoron, two words put together that are opposites.
Which brings up the other word – ecclesiology! That is merely the study of the “church”. The question is not whether people can believe in something. But whether they can do this without the “institutional church”. Or, the “local church”.
Lately I have come across seniors who are close to me. They have been a part of a church for decades, but are now not connected. And a good friend who has been a mentor to me. Part of a church even in the tumultuous 60’s and 70’s. Now no longer attends.
I’m curious. What are the reasons? What alternate communities are people forming to take the place of the “local/institutional church”?
Do you mean “inactive members”? I work alongside many seniors at our church and they feel like they have done all they can do. You know that saying”been there,done that”? They’re tired and they just want to be there. They live their faith, are in attendance at church but just want to be in the background. I have to say that I have learned so much from them, they have been my mentors and I truly appreciate all of them in whatever capacity they can give.
I’ve worked with those seniors as well! They are great.
I’m thinking more of those who no longer attend even though they could still get out to church services.
Interesting to see Laurie’s(above) comment, because that is the first thing that came to mind.
“Been there, done that”.
Personally speaking, I am looking for deeper
friendships that a lot of “regulars” are willing
to give. Whether they are so satisfied or would
rather have just a shallow acquaintance is a good
question. To be able to converse about spiritual
things with openness and honesty , without wondering whether you are going to be judged for
what you say or think, would be a great blessing.
Am I in the minority when I think this??
Betty
Error above . should have read “not willing to
give”