“Process” revival allows for the time to search out your heart, to go deep in self introspection, to repent thoroughly. A continuous worship/music/soaking time fits this perfectly.
“Practice” revival allows for the action of repentance to be clearly seen, for actions to lead to enhancement of spiritual growth, and for renewal to be seen. The activity of asking for forgiveness and restoring relationships fits this perfectly.
There is a tension that can arise when we talk of revival. Some want to start at one stage, others at another. All stages are important, and there likely are more stages. If we complain that our stage of revival is the most important, or has been overlooked, we polarize a broad movement of God. Momentum is lost. God help us!
PS/BTW/comment: This comes out of reflection of the 1970’s revival era I experienced as a late teen. Then, within much the same time period, there was the “Four spiritual laws” vs. a much more open approach to salvation requirements. Dualities constantly arise and seeking a radical centre is important. The middle is not for comfort’s sake, but for the kingdom’s sake. The radical centre will see offense, suffering and even hurt. But in the end the desire is for unity (while uniformity and polarity are set aside).